<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Log 0.1 &#8211; ARP Fingerprinting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaeldaw.org/reborn/chapter0/log-01/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaeldaw.org/reborn/chapter0/log-01</link>
	<description>Weekly humour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pagvac</title>
		<link>http://michaeldaw.org/reborn/chapter0/log-01/comment-page-1#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>pagvac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldaw.org/log-01/#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>No, they *cannot* do ARP OS fingerprinting. I was simply referring to ARP scanning (2nd-layer enumeration of live hosts in current subnet). Sorry about the confusion :-(. 

However, let&#039;s remember that sometimes by simply getting the OID (first-half of the MAC address) you can tell a lot about the target by looking up the vendor name, but obviously it&#039;s *not* as accurate as OS fingerprinting.

So yes, users interested in 2nd-layer OS *fingerprinting* should then use a tool such as arp-scan, as mentioned by dwk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they *cannot* do ARP OS fingerprinting. I was simply referring to ARP scanning (2nd-layer enumeration of live hosts in current subnet). Sorry about the confusion :-(. </p>
<p>However, let&#8217;s remember that sometimes by simply getting the OID (first-half of the MAC address) you can tell a lot about the target by looking up the vendor name, but obviously it&#8217;s *not* as accurate as OS fingerprinting.</p>
<p>So yes, users interested in 2nd-layer OS *fingerprinting* should then use a tool such as arp-scan, as mentioned by dwk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david.kierznowski</title>
		<link>http://michaeldaw.org/reborn/chapter0/log-01/comment-page-1#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>david.kierznowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldaw.org/log-01/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>pagvac,

Yeh, but can they perform ARP OS Fingerprinting? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pagvac,</p>
<p>Yeh, but can they perform ARP OS Fingerprinting? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pagvac</title>
		<link>http://michaeldaw.org/reborn/chapter0/log-01/comment-page-1#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>pagvac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldaw.org/log-01/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Also worth it mentioning that arp scanning can be done with popular tools such as nmap and Cain (for those that are lazy to download a different tool :-)  ).

My favorite nmap arp scan command:

nmap -n -T5 -sP -PR 192.168.1.0/24

In Cain:

Sniffer/Hosts/(Right-click) Scan MAC Addresses</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also worth it mentioning that arp scanning can be done with popular tools such as nmap and Cain (for those that are lazy to download a different tool :-)  ).</p>
<p>My favorite nmap arp scan command:</p>
<p>nmap -n -T5 -sP -PR 192.168.1.0/24</p>
<p>In Cain:</p>
<p>Sniffer/Hosts/(Right-click) Scan MAC Addresses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
